I'm going to have medical operation on my eye tomorrow because of tinting in the crystal tissue. Most of the cases are successfully done, so I'm heard, but I'm so threatened! I've never invaded by any artificial surgical operation except impacted third molar extractions. Remembering the saying by my aunt who went away tens year ago, "Any surgical operation whatever reason it might be is no good for sound body condition.".
I happen to obtain two historical heritage, one is Leica M3 and another Nikon F2, both of them are vessels that reigned supreme during the golden age of silver halide film.


Very individual opinion is allowed here, some old lenses has specific capability to resolve with atmospheric surrounding especially when utilized on old objects. This is why I often employ Leica or Leitz lenses produced half a century ago. My description doesn't always mean that old one is superior to newly computer designed sophisticated recent expensive ones for digital format. As for my selfish opinion, excellent datum on the correction of aberrations are not superior to Triplet in atmospheric resolution. Piled many glass layer for correction might do halm on the air condition how much correction might be desired. Consequently, my curiosity never turn to a newer heavy zoom lens at all. However smart it might be on the correction of errors, the performance never makes me turn on them. Also, Hi-zooming ratio cannot be an attractive factor. The higher the ratio of zooming, the less quality of the transparency becomes.
![]() |
フォルクスワーゲン ビートル Original Marina Blue paint with rusting a bi ... |
![]() |
フォルクスワーゲン ゴルフ (ハッチバック) Unexpectedly, I was obliged to change vehicl ... |
![]() |
アウディ A3 34,000km used for 9 years second handed vehi ... |
![]() |
Cal (トヨタ カルディナ) Though some anxiety existed before I obtain ... |