Electric Vehicles Deserve a New EPA Range Test
The numbers the EPA assigns are almost never achievable in the real-world situations that matter most.
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a33825136/evs-deserve-a-new-epa-range-test/
<以下引用>
From the September 2020 issue of Car and Driver.
There are a number of factors that make an EV's EPA range unachievable in real-world driving at the highway speeds where range matters most. For starters, EVs can benefit from the EPA test's speed fluctuations via regenerative braking, which puts energy back into the battery. Most gas-powered vehicles can't do that.
There's another fundamental difference. Every EV in production except the Porsche Taycan has a single reduction ratio, so as speeds rise, their electric motors spin faster and less efficiently. Gas cars have multispeed transmissions with a tall top gear for high-speed cruising at a low, efficient engine speed.
This is why gasoline-powered vehicles regularly beat their EPA highway figures in our real-world 75-mph highway test, yet no EV has even matched its EPA range. An Audi e-tron came closest, missing its label value by 7 percent. A Hyundai Kona Electric is our worst, falling 38 percent short in winter temperatures. Among all EVs we've tested, our real-world range averages 24 percent less than what's on the window sticker.
Even our figures are generous. Car and Driver's 75-mph range assumes an EV can use 100 percent of the battery's available capacity, which isn't practical since limited charging infrastructure makes "coasting in on fumes" a risky gamble. And because batteries charge quickest between about 20 percent and 80 percent capacity and slow considerably at the extremes, it typically doesn't make sense to wait for a complete charge during a road trip. Running the heat or air conditioning can also reduce an EV's range substantially.
All of this means that if you want an EV that can repeatedly drive 200 miles on the highway between charges, you'll need to look for one with an EPA range around 350 miles. That makes the agency's current ratings more misleading than helpful. EV buyers deserve a realistic range test that places more emphasis on high-speed highway driving.
<引用終わり>
電気自動車は回生が効かない高速連続走行時は航続距離に注意が必要。
ポルシェのタイカンはリダクションギアでモーターの回転数を抑えて高速巡行できるようになっている・・・等々書かれてます。
初代プリウスの亀マークの状態になったら、亀マークどころか走れなくなってしまう上に充電ステーションまでたどり着けないし、レスキューで充電しようにも充電に時間がかかるし・・・ということで、電気自動車の高速走行時の航続距離にはお気をつけあれですね。
うちの某車だとガソリン車で高速走行でも見る見るうちに燃料減るので電気自動車の高速走行と同じ感覚かもです(^^;)
Posted at 2020/08/31 17:52:01 | |
トラックバック(0) |
興味深い | クルマ
Electric Vehicles Deserve a New EPA Range Test
https://car.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/1272241.html
